Eva Bennemann vs Victoria Pohle Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does second serve performance stand for each player? Bennemann has a 37.69% win rate on second serve, slightly lower than Pohle's 39.53%, suggesting Pohle may have a slight edge here.
• When it comes to returning the opponent's second serve, Pohle outperforms Bennemann with a 56.74% success rate compared to Bennemann’s 51.26%.
• In contrast, Bennemann has a better record when returning first serves, winning 42.25% of these points versus Pohle’s 38.33%.
• Under pressure, Bennemann has a marginal advantage by saving 41.67% of breakpoints compared to Pohle's 39.51%.
• Examining match performance over the last year, Bennemann boasts a higher win rate at 70%, while Pohle has won 62.5% of his matches.
• On the preferred surface, Bennemann excels on clay with a 68% success rate, whereas Pohle achieves a win rate of 50% on clay.
• In terms of competitive level, Bennemann has been more successful at Challenger/ITF events with a 70% win rate, surpassing Pohle’s performance at Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a 55.56% win rate.
• In deciding sets, Bennemann shows stronger resilience, securing 75% of those tightly contested sets, whereas Pohle wins 63%.
• Finally, in breakpoint opportunities, Bennemann has a slight edge, converting 46.51% compared to Pohle’s 45.36%.

Editorial Prediction (July 24, 2025, UTC):

Both players have demonstrated their capabilities in various areas of the game, yet some aspects indicate different strengths. While Bennemann shows a slight edge in first serve returns and breakpoint conversions, Pohle has shown superior second serve performance.

Bennemann's higher success rate in close matches, as evidenced by his 75% win rate in deciding sets, contributes significantly to his competitive profile. Furthermore, Bennemann's slightly stronger record on the clay court and in higher-tier tournaments suggests he may be better equipped for this matchup.

While both players are competitive, Bennemann's consistency in tight scenarios and better adaptation to challenging opponents gives him a subtle but noteworthy advantage. Thus, Bennemann is the more likely victor in this upcoming contest.